making objectivity in regulatory science: sites and practices
admin | 30 May, 2008Vortrag
Sheila Jasanoff (Pforzheimer Professor of Science and Technology Studies, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University)
June 18, 2008, 6:15 pm
Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Halle
Advokatenweg 36, 06114 Halle
Main Seminar Room
Abstract
I start by laying out my cultural argument that the US policy system favors a “view from nowhere” objectivity — an epistemic position that is premised on the possibility of washing out all standpoints. After briefly connecting this preference to features of US political culture, I explain how that “view from nowhere” is accomplished at several different sites of practice, all of which have to function in harmony in order to produce a specific meaning of objectivity. The sites I consider are: (a) administrative practices of rulemaking; (b) expert advice and peer review; (c) courts and legal boundaries; and (d) globalization of US administrative assumptions (e.g., at the EU and through the WTO). These are treated as independent sites of practice, governed by their own rules, and connected mainly by the shared commitment to producing a certain form of objectivity.
Weiter Informationen finden Sie auf der Website des Max-Planck-Instituts.






letzte kommentare